Sonic Wiki Zone

Know something we don't about Sonic? Don't hesitate in signing up today! It's fast, free, and easy, and you will get a wealth of new abilities, and it also hides your IP address from public view. We are in need of content, and everyone has something to contribute!

If you have an account, please log in.

READ MORE

Sonic Wiki Zone
Register
Advertisement
Sonic Wiki Zone
Forums: Index > Questions > Categories


Are the following categories necessary? Most of them i'd say no to.

  • Singles
  • Consoles
  • Handhelds
  • Classic/Dreamcast/Modern era. (for anything, chronoligally, not just games)
  • Articles that have already been featured (I actually like this one)

TheAwesomefroggy (talk) 05:48, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

      1. Yes.
      2. Yes.
      3. Yes.
      4. Yes.
      5. Not really.
    • It really doesn't hurt to have precise categories. Too few categories can get cluttered very quickly, and it's easier to find things when they're categorized properly. I'd rather search a small, specific category for an article I can't remember the name of, rather than slog through a huge, generalized category. Trak Nar Ramble on 06:57, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
K, guess I should make the first four then? Or wait for other to approve? TheAwesomefroggy (talk) 23:06, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
You may want to wait for more consensus. I was under the impression that those categories already exist. Trak Nar Ramble on 04:41, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

I'd say yes to the second and third suggestions. The only reason I'm not supporting the first category is because I have no idea what that means. We do not need the era categories. And we already have a featured article category. Twinkle Snow Unleash Christmas 2013 18:42, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

  1. Yes, because they exist and so far we've been lumping them in with albums.
  2. No, because it's covered by Systems.
  3. No, because it's also covered by systems.
  4. No, because I don't see any reason for it whatsoever.
  5. No, because it already exists. -- Supermorff (talk) 19:00, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
There wasn't a real reason for #4. Just seein' if anyone else likes the idea. TheAwesomefroggy (talk) 23:34, December 13, 2012 (UTC)

Is a Crush 40 category necessary? TheAwesomefroggy (talk) 09:55, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

I assume you mean a 'Songs by Crush 40' category? Not necessary; I'd personally prefer just to list the relevant songs on the Chrush 40 page. But it's also not something I'd get worked up about if it was there. -- Supermorff (talk) 14:14, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
Advertisement