Forum:Should they turn the archie comics into a cartoon?

Forums: Index > General > Should they turn the archie comics into a cartoon?

Yes. Sonic x was good but maybe the archie comic series(based off of the Satam) will be better with more characters.

			06:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC) THE TROLL Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales Thetalktemplate TTT
			I think that's a great idea under the proviso that they release it in the UK.

It will only be as awsome with Jaleel White. If they made the series with just any old voices (Such as X's current ones) if be v. happy. If Jaleel White (Sonic), Kath Soucie (Sally) and the SatAM voiced all the characters, Iw ill be so happy I will cry.--Mystic Monkey 23:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah man! i totaly agree, in fact they shod also mak it a game with all voice actors from SatAm to the Adventures voice cast (like ryan drummond) to the 4kids voice actors.--Sonic & Scrab Master 12:36, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Technically though; the question on "Should they turn the archie comics into a cartoon?" has been answered in 1993, the comics being based on the cartoons is actually the other way round. The first issue was released in May while the first cartoon aired in September 18. 4 months after the comic was printed. Besides most of the SatAM voice actors are still alive and well today. Infact I updated the Sonic voice cast with Wikipedia articles to those who wanna know what they are up to. Wikipedia until these voice actors have SNN articles. Anyway it seems if all asked for a come back and just so happen to agree only Christine Cavanaugh wouldn't be able to make it. But since she also did roles for Chuckie from Rugrats and Dexter from Dexter's Lab, perhaps Candi Milo (Dexter's Lab) or Nancy Cartwright (Rugrats) being that they replaced her roles would be the best choice to voice for Bunnie. If it was me running the show I would go into great efforts to get all the SatAM voice actors back especially picking out good replacements like I said. But fat chance and doubt the continue of SatAM based on the comics, I doubt they would go through such efforts and probably go for cheaper means as 4Kids voices.--Mystic Monkey 20:34, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

What!? No way! The comic sucks so hard! It'll spoil my hero's reputation! Do you want Sonic to lose in the face of videogames?!--LonelyAssassin ^{'Vote My Poll'} 10:19, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

The comics arnt as good as the computer games but they have more of a plot than the games do. the games rely on gameplay for the progress of the story while the comics, while little in common witht he game, have more plots to spare.--Mystic Monkey 10:43, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

I'd LOVE them to make a new one! Sonic X sucked a lot,But the comics are REALLY sucsessful and Funny! The only problem is (Blech) Sally Acorn. Satam and AoSTH were funny,But SOnic Underground was REALLY sad....:(-Sharna here! Chat! Sonarna! 22:24, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

I don't like the comics much because of there sucsess. It gets more "original" by the comic and less to do with the games making them 2 seperate different canons. I didn't had much respect for the cartoons, only faving them as I am a Sonic fan. However after hearing what Ben Hurst had to say on my DVD collection I took an interest through a different perspective. As for the comics Im in no hurry to collect the archives but collecting them neverless ,it's full of good stories by good people so I'd recomend making a film after the comics than winging it like last time. Unless you want to return to Planet Freedom!--Mystic Monkey 23:38, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

That movie was stupid,Yet somewhat funny.-Sharna here! Chat! Sonarna! 23:01, October 29, 2009 (UTC)