Fandom

Sonic News Network

Journalistic

aka the Forces of Quality

Administrator
6,242 Edits since joining this wiki
November 16, 2011
  • I am the bow to your arrow

I am a social media and site coordinator. If you want to address issues of the wiki, please contact other available administrators.

54.144.217.63
  Loading editor
  • You know about the state of the comics? How do you know for certain that they have not been canceled? I am only curious.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    05:02, February 6, 2017
    • There is no information to justify the "cancellation" of the comics. All of the info we have heard so far were baseless rumours from the SSMB misinterpreted as fact, and the only factual point to arise from this was a call to an unofficial Archie spokesperson/telemarketer, who's comments are taken in the wrong light. Sites like The Sonic Stadium and SoaH City with little background in basic journalism are doing a disservice to this community by publishing speculation as fact.

      It's not rocket science, Ultra. It wasn't officially confirmed either.

        Loading editor
    • Journalistic wrote: There is no information to justify the "cancellation" of the comics. All of the rumours we have heard so far were baseless rumours from the SSMB misinterpreted as fact, and the only factual point to arise from this was a call to an unofficial Archie spokesperson/telemarketer, who's comments are taken in the wrong light.

      It's not rocket science, Ultra. It wasn't officially confirmed either.

      I worry and I am pessimistic. That is who I am. However, I am gonna assume that you have no official statement that states they are on hold either? I just need to be sure.

        Loading editor
    • Ultrasonic9000 wrote:

      Journalistic wrote: There is no information to justify the "cancellation" of the comics. All of the rumours we have heard so far were baseless rumours from the SSMB misinterpreted as fact, and the only factual point to arise from this was a call to an unofficial Archie spokesperson/telemarketer, who's comments are taken in the wrong light.

      It's not rocket science, Ultra. It wasn't officially confirmed either.

      I worry and I am pessimistic. That is who I am. However, I am gonna assume that you have no official statement that states they are on hold either? I just need to be sure.

      How can I provide evidence on a issue that doesn't exist? The only thing we know is that a few issues were delayed. Archie is refusing to speak on that matter. Therefore, any info that suggests a cancellation in the absolute slightest are all false.

        Loading editor
    • Fair enough

        Loading editor
  • Hello Journalistic. It's come to my attention that you have been closing threads without reasoning, both on your wall (which I presume is acceptable to an extent) and on regular forums outside of your wall. I have been asked by a user to ask you to not do this anymore and, at the very least, give a reasoning behind you closing threads.

    Hope you don't consider this annoying, just didn't want you to get in trouble. :)

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    I've got what you said. I'm not willing to respond any further. And please, don't reopen threads on my wall.
    01:32, December 20, 2016
    • How melodramatic of this wiki. It was only two public threads I've closed. I've told Myself 123 to reopen them. 

      Plus, I should not, and will not, give any reason behind the closing of any thread that falls under my username. It is my message wall and it is my responsiblity to maintain it. 

        Loading editor
    • Understood. But could you at least give a reasoning instead of just blatantly closing a message without answering? As an administrator (which you are, not just a coordinator), users will be coming to you, someone who was permitted administrator rights, to at least help them. Closing their concerns or questions they have for you without any questions is essentially shutting them out, which is an attitude administrators shouldn't have. We should help users, not ignore their concerns and close without reasoning.

        Loading editor
    • And again, you close this thread without responding. I gave you a warning and you refuse to even respond to it. That being said, I will repeat myself one more time: you are an administrator. Closing threads on your message wall to users asking you questions without a response or even a reasoning for doing so is not something you, one of our chosen administrators, should do. And again, I'm asking you to at least give some sort of reasoning behind you not responding to user's pleads. This isn't about the two threads you've closed that Myself 123 talked to you about. This is about the numerous amount of messages users sent you that you refused to respond to.

      You're an administrator, quit shutting yourself out and actually take some time to answer the questions or requests that others take the time to ask you.

        Loading editor
  • Wouldn't leaving or self-demotion be easier than this self-sabotage? Perhaps that's just me.

    Best of luck in your future endevours.

    EDIT: Fo'sho, but a lack of communication leads to complications. If you're unwilling to address problems, alternatives are going to have to be made. You must realise that. Like right now, I either edit this message or start another thread.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    01:19, December 16, 2016
  • Hello Journalistic. Sorry to do this, but I just need to know what is going on. The behavior that I can understand you are exhibiting, like ignoring people, closing threads prematurely and making snide comments is not behavior fit for an administrator. You are a social media and site coordinator, so you know what proper behavior is needed to be exhibited here on SNN. I may not understand what is going on on your end, but I need to tell you that as an administrator, people and other users look up to you as an example, and you must understand that your actions reflect SNN's nature. If a SNN administrator does not behave, how can we trust one another? However, I know you were made an administrator for a reason: because you were trusted to carry that responsibility. I thus ask of you to kind and respond to this in a proper fashion so we may clear out what the issue is.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    00:58, December 16, 2016
  • Is there an actual reason you keep closing still active forums? If you just like doing it, I'm sure there are plenty of inactive forums that need closing.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    20:32, December 15, 2016
  • How exactly is is wrong? It's the same how I did it last year.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    19:12, December 3, 2016
  • That comment made me feel indifferent, not sure what you're implying.

    Replying here as you closed the thread. I don't want to leave guessing now.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    03:27, November 25, 2016
  • We've actually only been waiting since August, not February. Me personally, I've been waiting to here from MetalMickey, who last I checked was busy with college. I've been content for someone in more regular contact with him to handle this particular interview, but apparently it hasn't been handled yet. Want me to look into it?

    P.S. I would've resigned from the job had we been waiting since February. I took over the job initially because we had been waiting for six months beforehand. Topping that by making us wait over eight months would have been an embarrassment.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    01:07, November 24, 2016
    • View all 11 replies
    • Journalistic wrote:

      How would he know he has a message on his wall if he's barely on this site?

      He's an admin. Unless it's a real life emergency or time-consuming matter, he has no excuse for being barely active.

      Journalistic wrote:

      There's no denying that he's online more on Discord compared to this place. However, there shouldn't be anything wrong with that. To be frank, this wiki's communication system is unbearable.

      Trust me, I prefer talk pages. But even then, I point you to the fact that he's an admin; he has a responsibility to pay attention. At the bare minimum checking his message wall once a day could have avoided this whole thing. A person should not need an account for an off-site chatroom to get in quick contact with an admin.

        Loading editor
    • Kagimizu wrote:
      Trust me, I prefer talk pages. But even then, I point you to the fact that he's an admin; he has a responsibility to pay attention. At the bare minimum checking his message wall once a day could have avoided this whole thing. A person should not need an account for an off-site chatroom to get in quick contact with an admin.

      The fact still remains, you should've took additional steps to contact him if you were dedicated to this. Anyways, he's still on the SNN/SNC Discord Group.

      That'll all I have to say. The other points aren't really relevant and only serve as distractions to the topic at hand.

        Loading editor
  • There are alot of words on one page because this site is an encyclopedia. Black font is alot more comfortable and pleasing to read on a white page. It looks cleaner and clearer which makes reading and editing easier. Basically, what I'm doing is increasing the contrast between the font and the page, because this improves its functionality.

    White page Gray

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    20:35, September 14, 2016
  • Hello Journalistic. It would really help a lot if you would voice your opinion here on whether or not things should be returned to normal. It is kinda of a big thing. I know you liked this idea, but we have realized other aspects.

      Loading editor
    Journalistic
    Journalistic closed this thread because:
    00:59, December 16, 2016
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.