This talk page has Archives:
Regarding underwear Edit
I've wanted to avoid bringing this issue up, but I feel now I have no alternative. There have been several instances where users, usually IPs have added Amy's underwear to the attire section. This information is usually removed by users due to it being considered inappropriate. I am however, in two minds about this. While such information could indeed be considered inappropriate, it is indeed a fact that Amy wears white panties, something that the creators of games starring Amy Rose like to point out all too often. So, I ask the community. Should this information stay, as it is factual, or should it be removed, as it can be considered inappropriate? Myself 123 23:22, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
Heck no! It's like putting the color of Sonic's socks!23:47, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
-*facepalm* This is just ridiculous. Why would anyone need to know this? We are supposed to display INFORMATIVE and USEFUL information.23:52, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
How about this we mention everything but the characters undergarments due to the fact that it would be offensive to some people and make others feel uneasy.Sonamyfan666 a Amy Rose Expert and fan (talk) 00:25, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
@SAF666: I assume you didn't even read the first post by Myself 123. He clearly has shared his views, and it looks as though he's in favour of keeping the information.
By the way, on Sonic's article, his socks aren't mentioned. And I'm glad they're not, because you don't even see them (the sock-like things are part of his shoes). I believe that we should only list items of clothing that you can see in any piece of artwork. I don't care about it being inappropriate, but you also don't see these undergarments (wuh-oh, I've said too much), and even though the creators have confirmed that she wears them, wouldn't Blaze and most other female characters wear them as well? What's the point? All in all, I don't agree with adding it. We may have to put up a voting section. 12:54, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
Uhh actually I think they're socks, as in, not a part of his shoes. Sure sometimes it appears as if the socks are a part of his shoes (SATSR and MASATOWG commercial) but that's probably to focus on what his feet look like (with the shoes, I mean) Uhhh... how do I explain this? I think the socks are shown with the shoe when they're off because the emphasis is not on the shoe, but what he wears on his feet. Am I making any sense here?--58SlugDrones • (Contact) 13:46, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
@Le: Amy's underwear is actually seen all to often. There's very few games satrring Amy Rose in which you can't see her underwear, and it's not like you have to try hard to see them either.
Well what were they thinking showing it like that?!?!?!
I stand by my opinion.14:46, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
I don't agree. This is a wiki for anything related to Sonic, an E-Rated games. What the purpose of this? Bringing perverts? 14:23, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
How about this we just mention undergarments and leave it at that. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
I agree we don't need it my last post was just trying to find a middle ground. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
Voting section yet?16:42, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
Yep let's set up a poll her and go with the one that has the most votes. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
Talk about underwear, there is also a girl who has some scenes like that, but not so much like Amy. 09:17, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
Were talking about the serie and site as a whole it leans heavily towards E rated. Also Shaodw was rated E for everyone 10 and up not Teen. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
I havel also noticed that Amy doesn't wear them in Sonic X as i was watching today.23:06, April 13, 2013 (UTC)
She does it's all depening on the seen. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
Signatures only please
Underwear should be mentioned on this page and any other page in which a character is seen wearing underwearEdit
- Myself 123 23:19, April 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Pacmansonic138 (talk) 23:45, April 13, 2013 (UTC)
- 00:58, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Lloyd the Cat"I don't die. I just go on adventures." 21:27, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
Underwear will not be mentioned and an invisible note will be left in the attire section inofrming users not to add Underwear to the listEdit
- 23:22, April 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere... 23:23, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- 23:39, April 13, 2013 (UTC)
- 23:41, April 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Tentomon22 (talk) 03:11, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
- MrSmartyMax 10:55, April 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Shadowunleashed13"I am...none of me..." 13:13, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
Peach and AmyEdit
Peach and Amy have never interacted to be rivals, even if they are shown dancing and things in the openings and trailers. The games are uncanon and there was no dialogue saying they are. If we are putting these characters on rival might as well put all the mario cast under the rivals section of each Sonic cast in games. These games are spin-offs and I refuse have Mario characters in the rivals section of character's in the M&S series!, and if we do put them in might as well put them under the friends and ally sections too they seem to get together well.21:47, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
Gentlemen, cast your opinions!21:48, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
I think we should only put the ones that can be seen to have a rival like engament with that characters. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
But that's the thing, Peach and Amy are not rivals21:53, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
I've seen enough of the Mario and Sonic series to say that yes they are. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
That doesn't make the rivals. That's like saying that Toad and Chao are rivals because they are commonly found throughout their world of their certain franchises and because they sit right next to each other on the "time to take a break" pop-up on the first game. Plus you're not telling which game is from this spin-off series this is from. I have the first M&S game(wii), I have seen a friend play the M&S DS version, i have seen gamplay of both winter versions, my cousins have the london 2012 version (wii) and i have seen many gameplay of London 2012 (DS) version none of them saaying that they are rivals. If it does not state in game it is not true unless SEGA or Nintendo have said so but nether of them have.22:13, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
Just because nethier company outright says nothing about it does not make it true we can clearly see that Amy and Peach are being presented as freidnly rivals to each other througout the series so therefor they are rivals.
The mission modes of SaMatOG and SaMatOWG for the DS show this, I'm not sure about MaSatL2012OG. The Point is, unless I'm mistaken, both of those games contain a one-on-one event with a character. I think that's enough proof, and if it isn't perhaps Eggman and Tails/Knuckles and Rouge shouldn't be listed as rivals. Myself 123 22:22, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
They are rivals, yes, I understand that they are rivals; the only thing I'm questioning is whether or not this fact should be mentioned. I thought only characters from the Sonic series could be listed in relationships. The characters are from different video game universes, and they only met in a spin-off series. Does this mean it should still be in that list?22:36, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps we should put up a poll?01:24, April 18, 2013 (UTC)
I was just looking on the current forums and seems that the Mario and Sonic Games are non-canical21:22, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
Just because it is non canon doesn't mean the fact there rivals isnt. The events of the game just never happned in the main games story but we still have to included them here. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
As defined by one user. Even if the games are considered non-canon, why shouldn't the rivals be listed? They've been there for some time and it's clearly listed as existing in the Mario and Sonic series. Plus, we have sections about the series in the history sections. Myself 123 21:28, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
Thats like saying Sonic and Mega Man are rivals because they are from different worlds and mistook each other as evil beings in Worlds Collide. Template:SplashTheHedeghog22:24, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
No that's different. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
No because they become friends later on. cause they were on rival systems doesn't make them rivals. and no one dorectly stated them being rivals. Peach and Amy are not rivals.22:32, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
You can have a rival that is also a freind Splash Amy and Peach are still rivals. Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
Should Peach and other Mario characters be stated as rivals?Edit
Cast your vote here. Only signatures please
- Sonamyfan666 Follow me inside, outside, through the stratosphere...
- Myself 123 02:45, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Shadowunleashed13"I am...none of me..." 14:50, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Tentomon22 (talk) 15:21, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Psyche the Hedgehog 1997 Talk
- 02:48, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 15:42, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
- OrbAdventures (talk) 04:33, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
Orb please put that in the disscussion area next time instead of making it a new section. Anyways, since no one has voted in a while it should be noted that any character from the Mario franchise should not be stated as rivals? Speak now or I should delete peach from the rivals along with other Mario characters tooken off the rival list in the M&S Series.22:59, April 30, 2013 (UTC)~
The poll did ._. and more people voted for it to be removed.23:09, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
but might as well so it, no one has voted in over a week.04:57, May 12, 2013 (UTC)